data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/642d2/642d2dd32bfb189c395f231418d7687c9aaa06c0" alt="" |
|
|
|
|
业务洽谈:
联系人:张顺平
手机:17727550196(微信同号)
QQ:3003262363
EMAIL:zsp2018@szczkjgs.com
联系人:鄢先辉
手机:17727552449 (微信同号)
QQ:2850985542
EMAIL:yanxianhui@szczkjgs.com
负责人联络方式:
手机:13713728695(微信同号)
QQ:3003207580
EMAIL:panbo@szczkjgs.com
联系人:潘波 |
|
|
|
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/80088/80088be331282c5d4255e9e65946adcf58026fb3" alt="" |
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c8896/c88964ef7eb48f722e8a75e67106e2e750e50028" alt="" |
当前位置:首页 -> 技术分享 |
|
|
HT8699/MIX3901/ANT8829内置升压双声道音频功放IC测试对比 |
|
|
文章来源:永阜康科技 更新时间:2019/5/13 10:29:00 |
|
1. HT8699升压输出:7.0V, ANT8829升压输出6.3V, MIX3901升压输出7V,
2. 测试条件:VDD=3.6V,RL=4Ωx2+33uH f=1kHz
(1). 功率测试:
防破音关闭,MIX3901输出功率最大;ANT8829输出功率最小;
防破音打开,HT8699跟MIX3901功率一样,都4.5W; ANT8829功率最小3.8W。
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/12805/12805303732b38e04e9101df6894cf0dd3c53af0" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f4d5e/f4d5eaf9368cac4dfb5e6fcff5bcc09d060d4875" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5ab88/5ab88454abaefdd36d4e9fdcc058fad976fad19c" alt=""
(2). THD测试:
Po=1W:
小功率测试,整个音频范围,MIX3901失真度最小,0.01%~0.02%之间;ANT8829在中低频部分比HT8699好;HT8699在中高频部分比ANT8829好。
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/609b3/609b3736c990a4a53404dd26a1e57e2e95c4052b" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/865eb/865eb7108a03f4ba1fc914dc0346652b37528784" alt=""
|
|
|
|
|
|
|